Establish the claim ceiling.
Start with what the public record actually supports before deciding what the case should mean.
PUBLIC-INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH · AUGUSTA–RICHMOND COUNTY
This case studies roads, drainage, vehicles, facilities, and other public assets without collapsing maintenance, replacement, new construction, financing, depreciation, and storm recovery into one headline number.
The goal is a reproducible public-record account that separates what is known, what is overdue, what is funded, what remains uncertain, and what additional records would be needed for a stronger conclusion.
HOW THE CASE IS BUILT
Start with what the public record actually supports before deciding what the case should mean.
Resolve many administrative representations back to the same physical lifecycle object.
Separate backlog, funding, renewal, capital scope, conventional liability, and external shock.
Measure a defensible physical stock or obligation-time before introducing a dollar balance.
Apply identity, stock-flow, shock, capital, funding, valuation, and missingness rules before summing.
Turn uncertainty into explicit evidence targets, then return to the claim boundary with a better record.
New evidence changes the admissible state of the case. Return to 01 Bound, recompute the claim ceiling, and run the loop again.
WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE
The case succeeds when another reader can see the infrastructure obligations and the evidence separately—and can tell exactly which missing records or classifications prevent a stronger citywide estimate.